Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #32 from LINBIT <partner@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-15 11:18:19 EDT --- Here is a listing of rpmlint warnings and errors that Fabio reported: > drbd.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary DRBD Well, it's the DRBD driver. What else is there to say? :) > drbd.src: W: strange-permission drbd.spec 0600 No idea. It's 0640 here. > drbd.x86_64: E: no-binary Yes the drbd metapackage could be flagged as noarch. No it currently can't be built that way. See comment #21. drbd-bash-completion.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/drbdadm Flagged with %config now. > drbd-pacemaker.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/drbd-pacemaker-8.3.4/COPYING Fixed. > drbd-udev.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized udev integration scripts for DRBD Even Wikipedia doesn't capitalize "udev" at the beginning of a sentence. > drbd-udev.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules Flagged with %config now. > drbd-utils.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /sbin/drbdsetup > drbd-utils.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /sbin/drbdmeta This one leaves me completely baffled. AFAICS this is supposed to happen when building with debuginfo disabled, not building with gcc -g, or when installing .so files without the x bit set. None of that is the case. I have no idea how to fix this. Building and installing, and then examining the installed files, yields this: file /sbin/drbdmeta /sbin/drbdsetup /sbin/drbdmeta: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped /sbin/drbdsetup: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped So, definitely stripped. And they're not missing from the debuginfo package either: rpm -qlp drbd-debuginfo-8.3.4-7.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib/debug /usr/lib/debug/sbin /usr/lib/debug/sbin/drbdadm.debug /usr/lib/debug/sbin/drbdmeta.debug /usr/lib/debug/sbin/drbdsetup.debug Either this is an rpmlint bug, or I'm overlooking something obvious. > drbd-utils.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib OK, this refers to helper scripts installing into /usr/lib/drbd. Discussed previously, it's my understanding that that is OK. > drbd-utils.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbd > drbd-utils.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbd chkconfig headers in the init script have been fixed. > drbd-xen.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/drbd-xen-8.3.4/COPYING Also fixed to default attributes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review