Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521671 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-15 01:10:28 EDT --- OK, I've finally found some more time to finish this up. You still have the unnecessary versioned dependency on R, but it's not a blocker so if you really want it, you can keep it. It's good that you contacted the author, but neither the source nor the upstream web site, nor anything publicly accessible as far as I can tell has any information that verifies that the license is actually GPLv2. What you need to do in this case is include the actual email you received from the author (assuming you did this via email) in the package so that we have some evidence of the actual license. Just include the text of the email as Source1: and install it as %doc. Now, I've taken long enough with this review and I really don't want to introduce any additional delay into the process, so I'll go ahead and approve this and trust that you'll fix things up before you check the package in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review