Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netperf - Network benchmarking tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529105 Summary: Review Request: netperf - Network benchmarking tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: pcfe@xxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/netperf.spec SRPM URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/netperf-4.0.0-0.rc2.1.fc11.src.rpm Description: netperf4 being GPL2+ (as opposed to netperf2) and needing this for testing, I decided that I might as well package it up. But, I definitely would like some more eyeballs on the spec, especially W: configure-without-libdir-spec is that acceptable with this package? W: shared-lib-calls-exit ... are these acceptable considering the libraries are only used by netperf? 2 zero length documentation files should I exclude them from %doc (as I did with NEWS) or leave them in? Especially examples/TBD seems to be there explicitly to show more examples should be coming from upstream Is the breakup between netperf and netperf-devel OK? Plus anything else I may have missed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review