Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-14 17:54:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Thanks for the review and helpful suggestions - I learned a few things. Any > suggestions on getting a rawhide buildable package? lowercasing the package name should have been sufficient, I'll check it tomorrow (my time is up today) Another point: oflb- in a font context means "a font downloaded from www.openfontlibrary.org" Since that does not seem the case for this package, you need to define another prefix You have some documented examples here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy#Naming We prefix font package names by foundry to group packages with the same origin in package management tools, since an entity that produced good fonts will tend to publish other good fonts, and an entity that produced average fonts unfortunately rarely gets much better (or improves its old fonts at the same time). So this is useful to the user. Other SIGs maye have made similar choices (or not) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review