[Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126





--- Comment #9 from James Antill <james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-10-14 01:35:27 EDT ---
 I'm pretty worried about multiple installable python's, so I've tried to keep
out of this (hey, it's David's problem now when he breaks the world anyway ...
I just get to complain :)
 Anyway, I think I can clear some stuff up:

4) IMO use a patch instead of sed, the advantage of sed is that a patch often
breaks as new upstreams of python are done. The disadvantage of sed is that
it'll keep almost working, silently, when new upstreams of python change
something.

5) The problems with TK are that it looks like gack, and has no i18n support.
So pygtk2 is _much_ prefered.

7) python-libs is separate for multilib, x86_64 has just:

python-devel.i586                        2.6-9.fc11                    updates
python-libs.i586                         2.6-9.fc11                    updates

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]