[Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-09-25 04:13 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> With yum, yes it will be pulled. 
> 
> But installing by hand, like I did, the normal user can't guess which package
> he/she needs.

It may be, however, this is already true for other packages.
You can see this by 'rpm -q --whatrequires firefox', for example.
Lots of X related requirement are specified by only library dependency.

> 
> ps: it's the same case as gputils in ktechlab.
That is not true.
For Ktechlab case, the requirement gputils is added because the dependency
for gputils is not checked by library dependency but it requires binaries.
in gputils as ktechlab tries to call the binaries.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]