[Bug 491545] Review Request: pynac - A modified version of GiNaC using Python

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491545


Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |




--- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-10-11 10:54:14 EDT ---
I'd liked to work on this (unless Conrad stepps in and says 'hi' ;))

There is a new version upstream, so I first bumped the release, but now there
aren't much rpmlint output:

$ rpmlint pynac.spec ../SRPMS/pynac-0.1.9-1.fc11.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/pynac-*
pynac-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
pynac-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


Is there still something to do, I missed?


SPEC: http://student.physik.uni-mainz.de/~spurath/fedora/pynac.spec
SRPM:
http://student.physik.uni-mainz.de/~spurath/fedora/pynac-0.1.9-1.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]