[Bug 526855] Review Request: webacula - Web interface of a Bacula backup system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526855


Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #9 from Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-10-09 11:38:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Sources and readme say that license is GPL version 3 or later. If this is
> correct, license tag should be changed to GPLv3+.

You didn't address this. Either comment (you're upstream developer, right?)
that it is licensed GPL version 3 only, or change the spec.

> And please split changelog entries by empty line.

Well, you removed older entries, but better to save changelog, even during
review - you'll have to do it anyway after package is imported.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]