Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #32 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-08 16:26:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > You are mistaken. %{_mandir} is automatically marked as %doc. Hm... Where? $ rpm --showrc | grep '[[:space:]]_mandir' -14: _mandir /usr/share/man > Apply "common sense". > Btw, that question has been answered before in this ticket, too. No "common sense" there. Mystique "common sense" you do not want accept when we see many dependency in doc packages in our repository! Also see before. > It would reduce flexibility if you added such dependencies to a Documentation > package. What flexibility it would reduce? You free to do not install Documentation at all. As required in guidelines main package can't rely on documentation in any case. Again, when I make separate examples sub-package you are speak about "excessive flexibility"... > [...] > > The problem in this review is that you put way too much emphasis on those six > tiny example source code files. The target group of that 25K of source code is > *very* small, the target group of built examples is even smaller. What exactly can mean size of examples in our situation?? Yes, it is not big, but why we should pay to that less attention? > IMHO, > including the files in the -devel package (without adding any extra > dependencies) would be the most convenient thing to do for developers. What is main - I do NOT strongly disagree with you there... But also I'm not sure what it is strongly correct way or it is mentioned "common sense"... > Anything beyond that would not be worth the effort. If I known what can do anything better, usually (unfortunately not always) I ready spent some additional effort to do that. And there no difference how many files or kilobytes in work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review