Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-07 11:05:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Only issue: missing BR/R on graphviz Fixed. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/umlgraph.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/umlgraph-5.2-2.fc11.src.rpm > > - sources fine (md5sums match) > - naming fine > - license fine > - builds fine > - files good > - macros good > - rpmlint fine (ignore maven fragment warning) > > $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/umlgraph-5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/umlgraph-* > umlgraph.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/umlgraph > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review