Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #10 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-06 13:03:10 EDT --- Could we get some more information on this? How many libraries are included? How many are dead upstream and how many won't accept brl-cad's patches? Where were the patches sent to? Where the libraries are dead upstream, the best thing to do would be for brl-cad upstream to take over (or release a renamed fork) with their modified versions. Where the upstreams don't want the changes we should find out why (a) the upstreams don't want them and (b) why brl-cad does. Then we'd have to decide whether to work with brl-cad to phase out the need for the library, work with the library upstream to clean up the changes for inclusion, or get someone (hopefully brl-cad) to maintain the forked version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review