Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-24 01:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #14) > > > I'm not agree with the removal of Requires gputils gpsim. > > > > > > Ktechlab requires gputils for PIC simulation. > > > > > > > Well, if it is common that Ktechlab is used for PIC simulation , in which case > > gputils is required generally, making Ktechlab require gputils is reasonable. > > Quite easy to prove/counter-prove: Show us the piece of source code that > introduces this dependency on gputils! Well, autually: [tasaka1@localhost ktechlab-0.3]$ grep -r 'gputils' . ./doc/en/flowcode.docbook: <para>Of course, if you don't have gputils installed - with which <command>gpasm</command> is distributed - then the last step can't be performed.</para> ./src/languages/gpdasm.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Disassembly failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); ./src/languages/gpasm.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Assembly failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); ./src/languages/gplink.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Linking failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); ./src/languages/gplib.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Linking failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review