Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #7 from matt chan <talcite@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-06 10:32:19 EDT --- Ack. I'm sorry, I don't know how, but I missed the email about Kevin's comment. I guess there's a downside to too many bugzilla emails. I will have some time to work on this in the weekend to fix the license and rpmlint errors. I thought they were only trivial ones, but I didn't test the most recent changes. The libraries are somewhat of a sticky issue. I consulted with the BRL-CAD devs on the possibility of abstracting out the libraries while building this package. It appears that they have made heavy 3rd party modifications to most of these libraries, especially Utah, Template Numerical, openNURBS, and NIST STEP, and the upstream projects are unwilling to accept them or are no longer active. TkHTML is a dead project as far as I know. None of those libraries listed should be present in fedora 11. Is it still considered a good idea to abstract out the libraries, or should we just consider them a part of the BRL-CAD package? According to the BRL-CAD devs, they don't really resemble the original libraries/projects anymore. To my knowledge, there is no project outside of BRL-CAD that makes use of their modifications to these libs. Thoughts? Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review