[Bug 527336] Review Request: opensaml - Security Assertion Markup Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336


Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |527308
            Summary|Review Request: <main       |Review Request:  opensaml -
                   |package name here> - <short |Security Assertion Markup
                   |summary here>               |Language




--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx>  2009-10-05 20:59:40 EDT ---
rpmlint   SPECS/opensaml.spec \
          SRPMS/opensaml-2.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm \
          RPMS/noarch/opensaml-doc-2.2.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm \
          RPMS/x86_64/opensaml-2.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \
          RPMS/x86_64/opensaml-devel-2.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \
          RPMS/x86_64/opensaml-debuginfo-2.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 
opensaml-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

no documentation in -devel since in -doc package.

Steve

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]