Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #29 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-04 00:59:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > > Wrong again. Man pages must be part of the subpackage they document. > > This normally means, *1's need to go to the base package, *3's need to go > > to *-devel. > I did not know. Please, can you point where it is described more precisely. It's "common sense" - c.f. the "MANUAL SECTIONS" in man man. > > The same as with man-pages. In general, doc's need to be part (Or be pulled in > > through package deps) of the package they document. > > => user-documentation goes into the base package > > => devel-docs into *devel packages > > unless there are technical reasons to do otherwise > We speak about separate -doc sub-packages now instead of "user-documentation > goes into the base package" I don't understand this remark. In general, separate *-doc (sub-)packages only make real sense in very few occasions, e.g. 1) when docs are optional supplements (e.g. a pdf's formated docs, which are already available in some other formats) 2) when docs are "big" and can be shared as "noarch"-subpackages between architectures. 3) when upstream ships docs as separate package ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review