Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #39 from Erick Calder <e@xxxxxxxx> 2009-10-03 21:36:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Fine. Remember, the changes must be visible not only for you, but also for the > other maintainers in Fedora. Sometimes, e. g. when a person is on vacation, > someone else jumps the gun in case of an urgent problem. ok. what I've done is added the spec file to ~rpm/cvs/afraid-dyndns and converted ~/prj/afraid-dyndns/spec to a link that points to it so the spec file is included in the tarball and lives with the rest of the source. is that ok? I don't need the tarball too do I? and the patches? (In reply to comment #38) > %if 0%{?fedora} = 10 > %patch0 -p1 -b .orig > %endif for some reason -p1 breaks the process with the error: Patch (afraid-dyndns.F10.patch): + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/afraid-dyndns.F10.patch + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .orig --fuzz=0 missing header for unified diff at line 5 of patch The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: Makefile |=================================================================== |--- Makefile (revision 2470) |+++ Makefile (revision 2471) -------------------------- File to patch: Skip this patch? [y] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored however, -p0 seems to fix that problem. now, in getting all this to work, I bumped up the spec file to -5. It wasn't really my intention but I haven't figure out my workflow so testing was done at points after a commitment. sigh. now my question is: if I have a -5 in F-10, do I then have to build -5 for F-11 and up (I'm not sure I understood the point in the link you had sent), or is it ok to leave those at -2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review