Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-01 18:27:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > 7. 65 is probably too high a prio for a fantasy latin font, 63-64 should be > > fine (see fontconfig-priorities.txt) > Where's this file? I tried looking in fontpackages{,-devel} and > fontconfig{,-devel}. /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt fontpackages-devel > Actually, one more question: the font filename (TTF) -- is there a naming > convention? right now it has the author's name -- dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Fontconfig does not care. I'd personnally remove the dalles_-_ stuff as it's junk added by the oflb upload process, but we have no hard convention one way or another PS meld or any other interactive diff tool is your friend to convert fontpackages-devel templates in actual spec/fontconfig files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review