Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #71 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-10-01 03:29:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #70) > I've reviewed the new spec file and the new src.rpm: > > You've stated in the %changelog of the new spec file, that the following > changes were done: > - Own %%{_datadir}/%%{name} instead of %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/classes > - Add Requires: %%{name} = %%{version}-%%{release} in subpackage. > Unfortunately the fixes are not done in this spec file. Please can you verify, > whether you've uploaded the wrong version of the spec file? Sorry-sorry! Off course it is my mistake. I fix it (Note, without release increase) http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc.spec > Regarding the packaging of the GCJ AOT bits I've asked in #fedora-java whether > it is really necessary in this specific case (jar files mostly used in a > browser on the client) and they've agreed that it is not needed here. > > So once all changes are done which are stated in the spec file, I think all > issues are solved. ;-) Fine! Christian Krause, very thanks for that long and detailed review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review