[Bug 207313] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207313


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-09-23 10:46 EST -------
* source files match upstream:
   4d73c451f4f3a8f9a0516bd26af7f652  PHP_Compat-1.5.0.tgz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent (except for the usual bogus "dangerous-command" warning).
* final provides and requires are sane:
   php-pear(PHP_Compat) = 1.5.0
   php-pear-PHP-Compat = 1.5.0-1.fc6
  =
   /bin/sh
   /usr/bin/pear
   php-pear(PEAR)
* %check is present, but tests the packaging, not the package.  There are tests
for the package, but as with all PEAR modules it's not really possible to run
them at build time.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]