Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #16 from Rudolf Kastl <che666@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-30 11:04:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #6) > > wow... that was a quick review... but after quickly looking at the package i > > can see that the included readme references files that are non existant in the > > package. wouldnt it make sense to either exclude the readme or package the > > required files to test the turbogears application (they are existant in the > > tarball)? > > I guess we'll need some guideline how to properly RPMize TurboGears > applications. > But strictly speaking this is not a blocking issue for the package review i.e. > not MUST. not a must but i still prefer to use common sense and check for "relevant" issues when looking at a package (not trying to be a pain but trying to help increase the quality of the packages that enter the distro). while i know this is not a software review but a package review it still makes sense to get things sorted. if i see issues i am going to report them, even if they are not on the checklist and not rpmlint output. while still under review we are saving time and bandwidth to get things sorted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review