Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206816 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-23 00:35 EST ------- The source URL is failing for me; it's probably some sourceforge breakage. I specified a mirror (superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net) and it came through fine. * source files match upstream: 340a3e884729c22f45ff73353e2cc67a freedoom-freedm-0.5.zip * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: freedoom-freedm = 0.5-1.fc6 = freedoom prboom * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * game levels are acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * desktop file is properly installed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review