Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mathstuf@xxxxxxxx | |m) --- Comment #13 from Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-28 18:35:22 EDT --- Sorry for long reply time - was on vacation and forgot about this after... (In reply to comment #12) > - Should it be renamed to qcheckers? Upstream seems to have renamed from > kcheckers. It can still Provides: kcheckers for compatability. Don't think so. Qcheckers has never had a release and likely will never have. > - Please use BuildRequires: qt4-devel. EPEL/RHEL still has qt3 and when Qt5 is > introduced, will not require changes here (Since then qt-devel will be Qt5 as > well as qt5-devel). Yeah, may be your're right. Changed. Spec URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/kcheckers.spec SRPM URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/kcheckers-0.8.1-4.local12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review