[Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332





--- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-09-28 16:14:26 EDT ---
I wasn't 100% sure if the timestamps are important for compiled binaries.
Therefore, I interpreted the Guidelines very strictly. I had a similar
conversation on IRC and the outcome was that the timestamps are quite important
for noarch packages. But that's not the case here so I agree with both of you.
Thanks for clarification ;-)

$ rpmdiff dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm
dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-3.fc10.src.rpm 
S.5.....    SUMMARY
S.5.......T dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec

$ diff -u a/dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec b/dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec
...
-Summary: Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens
+Summary: Utilities for use with dual head setups using independent screens
...
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
...
+* Mon Sep 28 2009 Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.5-3
+- Fix spelling mistake
+

Looks good to me. Package dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-3.fc10.src.rpm with
sha256sum e16a46cf4e50cdca72ea1fc03a4d138ac341ec9e6ad478fb55b086586557fca1
APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]