Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-28 15:19:44 EDT --- Correct URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui-0.16.0-3.fc11.src.rpm FIX rpmlint $ rpmlint ./x86_64/gnustep-gui*0.16.0-3* gnustep-gui-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gnustep-gui-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgnustep-gui.so.0.16.0 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx this is unusual, but probably ok 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [michel@erdos RPMS]$ rpmlint ./noarch/gnustep-gui*0.16.0-3* gnustep-gui-doc.noarch: E: postin-without-install-info /usr/share/info/AppKit.info.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. ==> add another install-info line for AppKit.info OK source matches upstream $ sha1sum SRPMS/gnustep-gui-0.16.0.tar.gz SOURCES/gnustep-gui-0.16.0.tar.gz cc0a14f700a3736b8e4113d3ad80ed6f979d60be SRPMS/gnustep-gui-0.16.0.tar.gz cc0a14f700a3736b8e4113d3ad80ed6f979d60be SOURCES/gnustep-gui-0.16.0.tar.gz FIX build ought to be verbose (I missed this for gnustep-base too, the same fix applies) add the flag 'messages=yes' to the invocation of make Several trivial fixes: - summary and description (base and doc) should say GUI not gui ==> copy newer description from README; this is fixed upstream - library and devel subpackages: "Package" should not be capitalized - library and devel subpackages have very short descriptions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review