Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #21 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-28 14:58:21 EDT --- Yep. If people are meant to override those defaults by specifying their own versions in a ~/.ncrack/ file then /usr/share is fine. I don't know anything about the specifics of ncrack, though -- is it meant to be run by a user or setup to be run periodically by the system administrator? If it's run ad hoc by a user then configuration in a ~/.ncrack file is fine. If it's run on a schedule then it's very nice for system administrators to know that the configuration of services is all in /etc. Note that many programs which are used as both services and invoked ad hoc (or even ones that are purely ad hoc, for instance, mutt) do store files like this in /etc for the system admin to configure while leaving the user to edit dot files in their home directories when they want to customize their ad hoc usage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review