[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459


daner964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #136626|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




------- Additional Comments From daner964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-09-22 13:18 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=136952)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136952&action=view)
initng 0.6.8-2 spec file

(In reply to comment #327)
> while I think about it... SELinux scripts and requirements should be removed
> completely. FC5 policy contains already
> 
> | /sbin/init(ng)?	    --	    system_u:object_r:init_exec_t:s0
> 
> so that initng will be labeled correctly by 'rpm' itself.

Something like this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]