[Bug 525146] Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146





--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-09-24 10:45:52 EDT ---
I agree that 3 is best and 2 is awful.  I just put 2 out there since it is
technically possible.

Re 1 and 3, is is the SDL bindings that are the critical part, and, AFAICT, the
reason PDCurses was selected of ncurses.  I'm not aware of any ncurses SDL
bindings.  In a few cases in my own code, where I need both, I just use both,
for instance I've written but not yet released a game using ncurses and
SDL_mixer.

I think 3 would basically mean porting the PDCurses SDL bindings to ncurses.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]