Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-24 04:49:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Michel, AFAICS you did not fix any of the issues I pointed out in comment #7: > > - rpmlint is not clean > > Not sure what you mean; it is clean here: Please see comment # 7 or run rpmlint on the srpm: $ rpmlint Downloads/gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc10.src.rpm gnome-applet-window-picker.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (In reply to comment #16) > Not sure that is the correct reading. The guideline uses that versioned > dependency as an example, and it actually recommended removing the version > requirement, once the oldest supported Fedora release exceeds that requirement. I read this different: Since non of the downsides apply to this package, a versioned dep should be used here. However... > In this case, since there is a SONAME dependency that will pull in the correct > version of gnome-panel-libs, the correct version of gnome-panel would be pulled > in as well (because of the same SONAME dependency between gnome-panel and > libpanel-applet) ... I fully agree with you in this special case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review