Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-23 13:37:09 EDT --- Oh, for whatever reason you have privacy set so that a search for your name finds nothing. I see the "dsommers" account is not in the packager group and I don't see any offer to sponsor you in this ticket, so I've readded the NEEDSPONSOR blocker. One thing I note immediately is that this package does not use the proper set of compiler flags. I see you forced "-g"; you really need to pass all of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Don't worry about the "configure-without-libdir-spec" complaint; rpmlint just doesn't understand that your configure script isn't generated by autoconf. There is no need to try and work around bogus warnings at all, and doing so often only adds needless crap to the spec. The point is to address the rpmlint complaints in the review, even if it's just to note that the complaints are erroneous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review