Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-22 18:01:49 EDT --- There is no default license for code on CPAN. The "Unknown" on the CPAN page should be a reasonable clue to that. You must actually inspect the source to determine the license. All I can see is this in Nagios/NMSCA/Client/CommandLine.pm: NSCA Perl Client 0.1 Copyright (c) 2006 Matthew O'Connor (matthew\@canonical.org) Last Modified: 04-10-2006 License: GPL Encryption Routines: $encrypt Which would seem to suggest GPL+ (and certainly not "GPL+ or Artistic" as you have), but honestly it would be better if you contact the author for clarification. If you can obtain a statement of the license via email, you can include the text of the email in the package. If you can't get clarification for whatever reason then I think GPL+ would do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review