Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger@xxxxxxxxx Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review- --- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-22 14:03:07 EDT --- Setting UNAPPROVED for now. Config files go in %{_sysconfdir} (/etc on Fedora). This is part of the FHS and there is a Fedora Guideline that we follow the FHS. The question in this package is whether this file is a config file or a data file. In your (Martin) last email you gave an example of when the local system admin might want to modify this file to suit the local site/machine. If this is a valid use then this is a config file. So it needs to be installed somewhere below /etc and the file marked %config or %config(noreplace) in the rpm spec file. For reference, the message with the example https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-September/msg00887.html Sorry people didn't make clear the real factors in deciding whether this needs to get moved to /etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review