Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-21 19:42:35 EDT --- > $ rpmlint -iv chronojump-0.8.10-1.fc11.i586.rpm > chronojump.i586: I: checking > chronojump.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/chronojump/libchronopic.so > A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If > you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a > development package. If this is not meant for other software to use, then it can be ignored, yes. > I know it's expected to have clean rpmlint but it's weird for me to create an > devel package for libchronopic.so only, specially considering is not expected > to be used for developing. Most Mono packages don't have clean rpmlint outputs either, just because rpmlint does not consider .dll and .exe to be libraries and executables :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review