Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-20 05:20:23 EDT --- Sure, it's all good - just wanted to clarify your intentions and think we also did that on irc. Didn't want to end up with a "dead" package here. :) Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint output Please fix: ghc-xmonad-contrib.src: W: invalid-license BSD3 ghc-xmonad-contrib.src: W: strange-permission xmonad-contrib-0.8.1.tar.gz 0777 ghc-xmonad-contrib-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-xmonad-contrib library. (need a line break) Waived: ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/xmonad-contrib-0.8.1/libHSxmonad-contrib-0.8.1_p.a [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [=] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. See above rpmlint [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 03f74fda270aca759407787da73e50d9 xmonad-contrib-0.8.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Please fix the 3 rpmlint issues before importing to CVS. Package is APPROVED by petersen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review