Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-09-19 10:16:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks for the input Dominik & Jussi. I have implemented the changes in Jussi's > comments and will refer Nigel (the original author) back to your comments > Dominik as he has 'control' of the makefile. > > Jussi - if I add %{?dist} to the release tag then the src rpm becomes labelled > with the os version. Is this normal? because this would mean having to release > a different version for each current version of Fedora, where I think that the > spec file could be modified to support all versions (adding any necessary > changes when new releases are made). Yes, it is. The spec file is completely general, and if you build e.g. a .f11 srpm on Fedora 10 you'll get out a .f10 RPM. > Does anyone know the normal method for testing this on alternate distributions. > I have a qemu vm running Fedora 11, and have found a few issues which may or > may not be to do with the new OS, or this particular installation, namely gcc > builds with debug info in the rpm, rather than in a seperate rpm. I don't know > if this is a rpmbuild or gcc issue. This does require fixing as it is issued as > a warning when running rpmlint on the binary rpm files. Do you have redhat-rpm-config installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review