[Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906





--- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-09-18 14:59:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> An updated version has been uploaded, addressing the rpmlint warnings and other
> remarks.
> 
> 
> URL and Source fields are present in the spec file. Source1 is removed.
Ah, yes. Sorry about that: I'm used to looking at rpmdev-newspec created
templates, which have slightly better formatting.

> >>Any idea why they pass on the build server? Might it be that they 
> >>terminate with no error if there is no Internet connection, but fail 
> >>if there actually is?
> 
> The only test connecting to the internet is xml_remote. The others run
> completely local.
> What distinguish this subset of tests from the others is that they compile a
> seperate executable, linking with the frepple shared library. The other tests
> are using the frepple executable.
> The tests are expected to pass. The tests produce an output file test.out in
> their subdirectory. Its contents should explain the cause of the problem - my
> guess would be that it's a SH_LIBPATH issue...  

Will attach the failing test results.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]