Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-18 14:34:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Was there ever any progress on this package? I've been keeping an eye on upstream and submitting patches, mostly related to circular dependencies and weak links. However, most of the problems haven't been fixed. For example, see: http://code.google.com/p/coot/source/browse/trunk/ideal/Makefile.am and the commented out sections. 0.6.1 is due out soon, and I have more recent versions of the package based on SVN builds that are essentially "pre" packages, so I've been kind of sitting on this until 0.6.1 arrives. > I wouldn't object to those build > dependencies, though these days we prefer using "tex(latex)" in Fedora to avoid > talking about any specific TeX distribution. I've honestly no idea what might > be required for EPEL as it's getting so far behind in packaging now. Sure, I'll make the edits to the .spec and post something this afternoon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review