Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Erick Calder <e@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(e@xxxxxxxx) | --- Comment #8 from Erick Calder <e@xxxxxxxx> 2009-09-17 15:57:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I'd suggest using %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 here. I should have thought of that :) > There is missing 'Requires: httpd%{?_isa}' otherwise the package could be > installed into unowned directories and it also obviously would not be working > without httpd. well... I didn't add a Requires field because the manuals say not to; that one should rely on the dependency generator, although it seems that is a little lacking since it missed httpd (it did pick up on the need for GnuTLS): config(mod_gnutls) = 0.5.5-3.fc11 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgnutls.so.26 libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) so I've added it. thanks for picking up on that. latest version is -4 (see usual place for it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review