Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #6 from Alex Musolino <musolinoa@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-17 00:48:36 EDT --- > * ExclusiveArch > - This package does not build on ppc/ppc64. This is because > this package contains some codes which really won't work > on ppc/ppc64. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681058 > > This spec file needs: "ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64". Done. Looks like it *might* be possible to patch picprog to build on the ppc and ppc64, but I'll leave it for now. > ! About Patch1 > - I would rather install man file and binary file manually > for this package, however I will leave it to you where you > use patch this patch or not. Changed it to manual install using `install`. This removes the need for the chmod you mentioned. As for sponsorship... I have a few other packages I'd like to work on such as an assembler for Atmel AVR chips (as well as some packages for the RPM Fusion repos). I'll post the bug number here when I submit that package for review. Also, if I see any package review requests I'll have a look and see if I can help. Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog-1.9.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review