Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-20 16:36 EST ------- Reviewers want the one-package structure but do not give a single argument why this should be done or why multiple packages are bad. I gave arguments why I chose the multi-package structure and nobody responded to these arguments so far. > initng ... I still don't see it in the upcoming FC6 initng is an Extras candidate and can be added after FC6 release > ... package that are considered 'always present', such as lvm2 ... ok; this might be a response to my arguments. But I do not think that this is a valid one. 'lvm2' is always present due to packaging bugs only (mixed initscripts and core-functionality; bloated 'initscripts' package). I can not fix the other packages because I would have to make this discussion at lot of other packages. RH developers are usually ignorant regarding dependency issues (e.g. look at aspell -> perl dep, sendmail -> cyrus-sasl, initscripts -> low-level stuff) so this would be a lost battle at least in Core. What I can do, is to package my packages properly and to separate core-functionality and unneeded/big dependencies which is giving users with e.g. chroots or non-SysV init a chance for a small system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review