Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-14 13:51:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Sometimes are the zero files needed even if rpmlint is complaining. You should > decide this yourself ;-) I'm not sure. I removed it and the module at least loads. I can only find one or two other perl modules with .bs files. We'll see. > The license is still unknown from the package. I didn't find it anywhere > mentioned in package or on site. This is slow but you should contact upstream > about correct licensing, if you've also don't find it in files. >From an email: Hi Orion: Sorry about not putting the license in. I'll add a COPYRIGHT file for the next release. It will be under a perl Artistic License: Copyright (c) 2004-2009 Douglas Hunt. All rights reserved. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. Regards, Doug dhunt@xxxxxxxx Software Engineer UCAR - COSMIC, Tel. (303) 497-2611 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review