Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #5 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-14 02:45:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Could we see the packages that you have not released in public, or are they for > some reason or another proprietary (e.g. done for a company under contract)? Sure, I attached three SPEC files which I created in the last year or two. A lot of other SPEC files I already deleted because I didn't need them anymore. But since I'm using pyicq-t for a while I would like to contribute to this package. For example making it more compliant/easier to write a SELinux policy and so on. > As discussed in the mailing list, any extra indication of packaging skill would > help. There are a lot of packages that are waiting for reviewers that you can > do pre-reviews for (say, 2 or 3); but looking at your previous packages would > work too, even if they can't end up in Fedora for one reason or another. Yeah, I will have a look at some other packages too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review