Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> 2009-09-13 09:48:56 EDT --- Hi, 1) The description is a little brief for gfork itself and could do with some expansion to describe gfork a little. 2) $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/globus-gfork-* globus-gfork.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libglobus_gfork.so.0.0.2 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx globus-gfork-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on globus-gfork/globus-gfork-libs/libglobus-gfork should at least be commented upon. rpmlint of .src.rpm and .spec pass fine. 3) Koji build good. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1674890 4) Should there be a default configuration file? [root@globus globus_gfork]# strace gfork 2>&1 | tail -3 ) = 6 write(5, "(null)/etc/gfork.confNo such file"..., 33) = 33 exit_group(1) 5) Not a blocker but there is not really any documentation for gfork in the package other than --help. Maybe that is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review