Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #22 from srinivas <srinivas_ramanatha@xxxxxxxx> 2009-09-10 11:57:27 EDT --- sblim-sfcb version 1.3.4 had the following rpmlint errors: rpmlint sblim-sfcb.spec sblim-sfcb.spec:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint ../SRPMS/sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-4.fc11.src.rpm sblim-sfcb.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sblim-sfcb-* sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcClassProviderGz.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcHttpAdapter.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcIndCIMXMLHandler.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcInternalProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcBasicPAMAuthentication.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcUtil.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcFileRepository.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcClassProviderMem.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcInteropProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libcimcClientSfcbLocal.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcInteropServerProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcCimXmlCodec.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcQualifierProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcBasicAuthentication.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcCertificateAuthentication.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcClassProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcObjectImplSwapI32toP32.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcProfileProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcBrokerCore.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/sfcb sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name sfcb 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 21 warnings. Fixed these warnings and made some changes as suggested by Praveen in comment #13. Here's the rpmlint output of the modified packages: rpmlint sblim-sfcb.spec sblim-sfcb.spec:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server sblim-sfcb.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: line 86) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [root@srini-f11 SPECS]# rpmlint ../SRPMS/sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-6.fc11.src.rpm sblim-sfcb.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server sblim-sfcb.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: line 86) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [root@srini-f11 SPECS]# rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sblim-sfcb-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The modified srpm and spec can be found at the following location: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcb/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review