[Bug 206989] Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989





------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-09-19 03:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for the --delete-original tip. Will look at changing that in the next 
> version. 
> 
> I noticed the failed dependency eariler, and was digging further. 
> After much hair pulling I finally found that the lovely 'abicheck' utility can 
> show you what private functions a binary is using, so we see: 
> 
> /usr/bin/twinkle: PRIVATE: (libresolv.so.2:GLIBC_PRIVATE) __ns_name_ntop
> /usr/bin/twinkle: PRIVATE: (libresolv.so.2:GLIBC_PRIVATE) __ns_get16
> 
> Those two will need to get patched/replaced. I will see if upstream can do 
> anything, or if I can come up with a quick patch to fix it. (Or indeed, if 
> anyone watching this bug has a quick fix. ;) 

You may be able to fix it by persuading the configure script that the function
isn't available, so that it either doesn't use it or provides a replacement. I
did that for __ns_get16 once:

ac_cv_func___ns_get16=no
export ac_cv_func___ns_get16
./configure ...


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]