Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 --- Comment #2 from Dominic Hopf <dmaphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-05 18:41:49 EDT --- $ rpmlint lxde-icon-theme.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUSTs ----- OK: packaged is named according to the package naming guidelines OK: specfile name matches %{name}.spec OK: package seems to meet packaging guidelines OK: license in specfile matches actual license and meets licensing guidelines OK: license file is included in %doc OK: specfile is written in AE OK: specfile is legible OK: sourcefile in the package is the same as provided in the mentioned source, md5sum fits OK: package compiles successfully N/A: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires there aren't any BuildRequires N/A: package handles locales properly there are no locales installed with this package N/A: call ldconfig in %post and %postun there is no binary installed with this package OK: package is not designed to be relocatable OK: package owns directorys it creates OK: does not list a file more than once in the %files listing OK: %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly OK: %clean section is there and contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK: macros are consistently used N/A: package contains code package contains *.png files, but this is ok since this is an icon theme N/A: subpackage for large documentation files there are no large documentation files N/A: program runs properly without files listed in %doc there is no program which could be run N/A: header files are in a -devel package there are no header files N/A: static libraries are in a -static package there are no static libs N/A: require pkgconfig if package contains a pkgconfig(.pc) there is no pkgconfig file N/A: put .so-files into -devel package if there are library files with suffix there is no library with suffix, in fact there isn't any library N/A: devel package includes fully versioned dependency for the base package there is no devel package N/A: any libtool archives are removed there are no libtool archives N/A: contains desktop file if it is a GUI application this package actually provides GUI.. OK: package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages OK: buildroot is removed at beginning of %install N/A: filenames are encoded in UTF-8 not necessary since there are no non-ASCII filenames SHOULD ------ N/A: non-English translations for description and summary a localization is not neccessary for this package OK: package builds in mock N/A: package builds into binary rpms for all supported architectures this is a noarch package N/A: program runs there is no program which could be run N/A: subpackages contain fully versioned dependency for the base package there are no subpackages N/A: pkgconfig file is placed in a devel package there is no pkgconfig file N/A: require package providing a file instead of the file itself no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required The package seems to be okay. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review