[Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988


Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-09-04 14:38:35 EDT ---
This was approved by FESco today, so I'm taking it for review.

Couple of things. You can simplify the exclusivearch stuff:

%if 0%{?fedora} > 11 || 0%{?rhel} > 5
ExclusiveArch:  i686 x86_64
%else %if 0%{?fedora} == 11
ExclusiveArch:  i586 x86_64
%else
ExclusiveArch:  i386 x86_64
%endif

(put the else and if on one line, and that lets you remove one endif - it's all
one clause, then).

As I understand the versioning policy, there should be a . between the revision
(5, at present) and the git date bit. It should be
libvdpau-0.1-0.5.git20090902.fc11 , not libvdpau-0.1-0.5git20090902.fc11 - see
the examples at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages .

rpmlint throws an invalid-soname error on libvdpau-trace.so . It's an
unversioned lib in %{_libdir} (not a subdirectory) in a non-devel package,
which is unusual. What exactly is it used for? Should it be versioned, or put
in a subdirectory?

Aside from the above, package looks good to me.

rpmlint output:

[adamw@adam SRPMS]$ rpmlint libvdpau-0.1-0.5git20090902.fc11.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[adamw@adam SRPMS]$ rpmlint
../RPMS/x86_64/libvdpau-0.1-0.5git20090902.aw_fc12.x86_64.rpm 
libvdpau.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-0.5git20090902
['0.1-0.5git20090902.aw_fc12', '0.1-0.5git20090902.aw_fc12']
libvdpau.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libvdpau_trace.so
libvdpau_trace.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
[adamw@adam SRPMS]$ rpmlint
../RPMS/x86_64/libvdpau-devel-0.1-0.5git20090902.aw_fc12.x86_64.rpm 
libvdpau-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]