Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx | |) | --- Comment #4 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-01 09:49:08 EDT --- I agree that carrying the full source is excessive. However, the way mkimage is built requires you to configure U-Boot for a board first. Newer versions also rely on the libfdt support in the U-Boot source code. So creating a trimmed down package can be done, but it would need to be done carefully. The config part is the trickiest. Configuring it for e.g. and i686 board may not be what you want if you are trying to build a PowerPC uImage, etc. I don't know off the top of my head, but some inspection would be needed if this were to be done in a general fashion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review