Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #9 from Sean Middleditch <sean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-31 18:18:07 EDT --- Alright, I'll change it to utils. I take it libproxy-bin is just grandfathered in then? I'll add the INSTALL="install -p" bit. The README was meant to be the license file. I only even included COPYING because autotools, in its infinite wisdom, practically forced me at gunpoint. :) I'll add COPYING to the doc list and remove docs from everything but the core pacakge. Also added NEWS to the doc list, since that is (or will be after another upstream release or two) relevant to regular users. Hmm. I'm getting an rpmlint warning on the subpackages for not including any documentation. Should I report this bug to fedora-packaging? ;) Note that I pushed an upstream release to 0.11 and updated the spec file accordingly. This mostly just fixes the configure.ac to actually check for and enable zlib, hence I re-added a BuildRequires on zlib-devel. libtelnet-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libtelnet-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. http://middleditch.us/sean/libtelnet.spec http://middleditch.us/sean/libtelnet-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review