Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #14 from Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-31 04:56:07 EDT --- When you submit a revised spec, make sure you bump up the release and add a changelog entry explaining the change briefly. You don't need to define the buildroot anymore. So you can drop, "BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)" Fix the typo in "Initial Pakcage" rpmlint shows the changelog as incoherent. Fix that as well. Instead of using conflicts, the right answer would be to get the packages that directly depend on notification-daemon to use the virtual provides called desktop-notification-daemon instead (a file based dependency can also work but I wouldnt suggest that). You have to file a RFE against them # repoquery --whatrequires --all notification-daemon blueman-0:1.10-4.fc12.i686 notification-daemon-engine-nodoka-0:0.1.0-10.fc12.i686 --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review