Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-08-31 03:48:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > AFAIS, (In reply to comment #18) > > AFAIK we don't add soname's, since that really should be done by upstream. > It's correct that it's hardly possible to invent SONAMEs if upstream doesn't, > but shipping a shared library without any SONAME doesn't work either. > > Or differently: Letting both the base package and the *-devel package contain > *.so, doesn't work. The guidelines are quite clear on that one: MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages Unversioned shared libraries are placed in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review